Overview

Urban Planning and Environment

Row

Publications in DiVA 2020
(fractional counts)

40.1

WoS coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

69.1 %

Scopus coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

94.3 %

Row

Notes more…

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is moderate, 69.1%.

Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.

Row

Background

The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Row

Researchers at the unit

Publication data is available only after login.

Publications in DiVA

Urban Planning and Environment

Row

Fractional count

Publication volume, fractionalized

Publication volume, fractionalized

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 13.5 11.7 11.2 14.2 15.5 16.3 15.3 97.8 70.4% 1.0
Article, other 1.8 1.2 3.9 1.8 NA 1.7 1.5 11.9 57.5% 0.9
Conference paper, peer review 1.8 4.2 3.8 2.5 2.6 1.2 1.2 17.4 61.8% 0.9
Conference paper, other 0.4 1.0 1.1 0.5 0.7 1.9 1.0 6.6 0.0% 0.0
Book 0.3 NA 0.8 NA 1.0 NA NA 2.2 0.0% 0.4
Anthology (editor) 1.3 1.3 0.8 NA 1.5 NA 3.3 8.3 0.0% 0.1
Chapter in book 18.6 22.7 8.8 10.2 11.2 4.1 15.8 91.5 0.4% 0.4
Article, book review NA NA NA NA 3.0 NA NA 3.0 66.7% 0.0
Report 1.1 0.3 2.0 1.1 2.6 1.5 0.8 9.4 0.0% 0.0
Doctoral thesis NA 1.0 NA 1.0 2.0 NA 1.0 5.0 0.0% 0.0
Licentiate thesis NA NA NA NA 1.0 NA NA 1.0 0.0% 0.0

Full count

Publication volume, full count

Publication volume, full count

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 28 28 30 33 31 34 35 219 76.3% 1
Article, other 3 2 6 3 NA 4 2 20 65.0% 1
Conference paper, peer review 5 8 6 7 7 3 5 41 61.0% 1
Conference paper, other 2 1 2 1 2 5 2 15 0.0% 0
Book 1 NA 2 NA 1 NA NA 4 0.0% 0
Anthology (editor) 3 3 3 NA 2 NA 4 15 0.0% 0
Chapter in book 26 25 12 17 16 6 23 125 0.8% 0
Article, book review NA NA NA NA 3 NA NA 3 66.7% 0
Report 4 2 2 3 6 6 2 25 0.0% 0
Doctoral thesis NA 1 NA 1 2 NA 1 5 0.0% 0
Licentiate thesis NA NA NA NA 1 NA NA 1 0.0% 0

Row

Publication volume

Publication volume

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Citation impact

Urban Planning and Environment

Row

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 14.0 47.1 3.4 5.1 36.2%
2015 10.9 39.5 3.6 3.2 29.5%
2016 10.9 37.0 3.4 5.4 49.4%
2017 12.4 49.8 4.0 3.1 25.0%
2018 13.3 51.5 3.9 2.6 19.5%
Total 61.6 224.9 3.6 19.4 31.5%

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Cf Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 25.0 1.24 4.1 16.5%
2015-2017 24.6 1.15 3.0 12.0%
2016-2018 29.1 0.97 2.3 7.8%
2017-2019 30.0 0.91 1.9 6.2%
Total 55.0 1.06 6.0 10.9%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 26 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 60.2%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 68 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 65.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)

Row

Average field normalized citations (Cf)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal impact

Urban Planning and Environment

Row

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Journal Cf Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 25.0 1.25 7.6 30.4%
2015-2017 24.1 1.19 7.6 31.7%
2016-2018 28.6 1.12 6.1 21.4%
2017-2019 29.5 1.11 7.0 23.7%
2018-2020 32.8 1.11 6.9 21.0%
Total 67.0 1.16 17.4 26.0%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 68 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 65.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)

Row

Field normalized journal impact (JCf)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

Urban Planning and Environment

Row

Summary

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

Publication years Publications Swedish non-university co-publications Share Swedish non-university International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 66 6 9.1% 26 39.4%
2015-2017 70 9 12.9% 34 48.6%
2016-2018 73 11 15.1% 32 43.8%
2017-2019 70 15 21.4% 32 45.7%
2018-2020 72 16 22.2% 37 51.4%
Total 164 27 16.5% 75 45.7%

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 66 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 72.4%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publication

Countries and organizations

Co‑publication countries

Co‑publication countries

Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
China 36 34 2 0 0 9.5
Rwanda 4 4 0 0 0 2.9
Belgium 10 9 1 0 0 2.5
Italy 10 8 2 0 0 2.2
Canada 5 5 0 0 0 2.2
United Kingdom 6 5 1 0 0 2.1
United States 7 6 1 0 0 1.7
Indonesia 4 4 0 0 0 1.2
Germany 6 5 1 0 0 1.1
Malaysia 4 4 0 0 0 0.9
Australia 3 3 0 0 0 0.9
Slovenia 2 2 0 0 0 0.8
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1 0 0 0 0.7
Netherlands 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
Finland 2 1 1 0 0 0.6
Spain 4 2 2 0 0 0.5
Brazil 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
France 3 2 1 0 0 0.5
Poland 2 1 1 0 0 0.4
Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Republic of Serbia 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Taiwan 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
South Sudan 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Uganda 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Switzerland 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Turkey 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Greece 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Co‑publication organizations

Co‑publication countries

Organization Organization type Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute Institute Sweden 13 12 1 0 0 6.2
University of Rwanda University Rwanda 4 4 0 0 0 2.9
National University of Defense Technology, NUDT University China 11 11 0 0 0 2.5
Lund University University Sweden 7 7 0 0 0 2.3
Jönköping University College University College Sweden 6 6 0 0 0 2.1
Hasselt University University Belgium 6 6 0 0 0 1.8
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute China 8 7 1 0 0 1.8
University of Gothenburg University Sweden 5 5 0 0 0 1.7
Linköping University University Sweden 5 5 0 0 0 1.6
Chalmers University of Technology University Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 1.5
Karlstad University University Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 1.2
Swedish Environmental Research Institute Institute Sweden 3 2 1 0 0 1.1
Bandung Institute of Technology (ITB) University Indonesia 3 3 0 0 0 1.0
Swedish Transport Administration Other Public Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 1.0
University of Cambridge University United Kingdom 3 3 0 0 0 1.0
Xidian University University China 2 2 0 0 0 0.9
Institute for Developmental and Strategic Analysis (IRSA) Institute Slovenia 2 2 0 0 0 0.8
Nanjing University of Finance & Economics (NUFE) University China 3 3 0 0 0 0.8
Shanghai Jiao Tong University University China 4 4 0 0 0 0.8
WSP AB Company Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 0.8
Tsinghua University University China 4 3 1 0 0 0.8
Beijing Normal University University China 3 3 0 0 0 0.8
Chinese University of Hong Kong University China 3 3 0 0 0 0.8
University of Cincinnati University United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
University of Trento University Italy 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
Babol Noshirvani University of Technology (NIT) University Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1 0 0 0 0.7
Queensland University of Technology University Australia 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
Karolinska Institutet University Sweden 5 4 1 0 0 0.7
British Columbia Minist Forests Lands Nat Resourc NA Canada 1 1 0 0 0 0.6
Nat Resources Canada NA Canada 1 1 0 0 0 0.6
Ryerson University University Canada 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
Stockholm School of Economics University College Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
University of Pavia University Italy 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
Umeå University University Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Chongqing Technology and Business University University China 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
CHONGQING UNIVERSITY University China 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
CIRRELT Institute Canada 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Edinburgh Napier University University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Federal University of São João del-Rei (UFSJ) University Brazil 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Nanjing University University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Southwest University (SWU) University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Transport Analysis Other Public Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
University of Montreal University Canada 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
University of Nottingham University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
University of Oulu University Finland 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
University of Regina University Canada 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Sapienza University of Rome University Italy 3 3 0 0 0 0.5
Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) Institute Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona University Spain 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology University China 2 1 1 0 0 0.4
Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University University China 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
National Innovation Institute of Technology Institute China 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China University China 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
University of Nottingham University Malaysia 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Ctr Entrepreneurship & Spatial Econ CEnSE NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Diponegoro University (UNDIP) University Indonesia 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Duke University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Eindhoven University of Technology University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Folksam Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Italian National agency for new technologies (ENEA) Other Public Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
KMV forum AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
MNR NA China 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Nanjing Agricultural University (NAU) University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
National Geomatics Center of China Other Public China 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
National Taiwan University University Taiwan 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Research Institute For Industrial Economics Institute Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Swedish Agency for Growth Policy Analysis Institute Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Swedish Ctr Innovat & Qual Built Environm NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Swedish Entrepreneurship Forum Other Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Technical University of Denmark (DTU) University Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP) University Malaysia 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Bremen University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Niš University Republic of Serbia 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Northumbria at Newcastle University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Warsaw University Poland 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
NA NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
China Agricultural University University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Delft University of Technology University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Doctors Without Borders (MSF) Other health services South Sudan 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
European space agency (ESA) Other Public Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Hunan University University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Indonesia University of Education (UPI) University Indonesia 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Technical University of Berlin University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Tun Hussein Onn University of Malaysia University Malaysia 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Melbourne University Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Pennsylvania University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Auburn University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Catholic University of Leuven University Belgium 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Decision Research Institute United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Free University of Brussels University Belgium 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Logistics Landscapers AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Nanchang Institute of Technology University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
National Institute of Agricultural Research (INRA) Institute France 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Network Water & Sanitat NETWAS NA Uganda 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
PE Teknik & Arkitektur AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Stockholm International Water Institute Other Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Telecom Bretagne University College France 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
United Nations Dev Programme UNDP NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Lyon University France 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Oregon University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Savoie University France 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Toulouse University France 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
PE Accounting Company Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.2
Swedish Research Council for sustainable development (Formas) Other Public Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.2
Södertörns University College University College Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.2
ETH Zurich University Switzerland 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Ghent University University Belgium 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Gävleborg County Council Other health services Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Istanbul Technical University University Turkey 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Leibniz University Hannover University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Ruhr University Bochum University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Solkompaniet Sverige AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Swedish Defence Research Agency Institute Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Technical University of Munich University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Washington University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Wuhan University University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Yale University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Assoc Rural Dev Thuringia NA Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
SOS Alarm AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences (BAAFS) Institute China 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Capital Normal University University China 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
China Meteorological Administration (CMA) Other Public China 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Chinese Academy of Forestry (CAF) Institute China 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Foundation for Research & Technology – Hellas (FORTH) Other Public Greece 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Inner Mongolia Normal University University China 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens University Greece 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
National Research Council (CNR) Other Public Italy 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) Institute Spain 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Ulster University University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Université Catholique de Louvain University Belgium 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Aalto University University Finland 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
California Institute of Technology University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Dares Technol NA Spain 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Eurac Research Institute Italy 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
European Space Agcy NA Italy 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (BKG) Other Public Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Inst Geodesy & Cartog NA Poland 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Polytechnic University of Catalonia (UPC) University Spain 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Alicante University Spain 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Rennes 1 University France 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
VTT Technical Research Centre Institute Finland 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Open Access

Urban Planning and Environment

Row

Open Access publications, full counts

Open Access publications, full counts

Publication Year Publications Open Access publications OA gold OA hybrid OA green OA bronze Not OA Share OA
2014 38 11 2 2 6 1 27 28.9%
2015 37 12 4 0 8 0 25 32.4%
2016 36 8 2 0 5 1 28 22.2%
2017 44 22 4 7 7 4 22 50.0%
2018 41 25 11 5 6 3 16 61.0%
2019 39 24 10 8 2 4 15 61.5%
2020 42 32 14 12 3 3 10 76.2%
Total 277 134 47 34 37 16 143 48.4%

Row

Notes more…

The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.

In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:

  • Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.

  • Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.

  • Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.

  • Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.

N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.

Row

Overview of Open Access publications - piechart

Stacked area chart for publications

Scopus

Urban Planning and Environment

Row

Citation Impact

Column

Citations, open window
Citations, open window
Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 15.4 394.0 25.6 0.8 5.4%
2015 16.6 245.2 14.8 1.9 11.4%
2016 16.4 166.2 10.1 4.5 27.6%
2017 18.2 229.1 12.6 1.4 8.0%
2018 15.5 105.5 6.8 2.0 13.2%
2019 17.8 99.0 5.6 1.9 10.8%
2020 17.1 78.1 4.6 2.8 16.5%
Total 117.0 1317.1 11.3 15.5 13.2%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Conference Paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 29 (full counted) publications with good Scopus coverage (at least 85.7%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Average field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Publication years Publications Average FWCI Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 41.9 1.53 8.6 20.6%
2015-2017 45.2 1.58 8.5 18.7%
2016-2018 45.5 1.29 5.5 12.0%
2017-2019 47.3 1.43 7.2 15.2%
Total 89.2 1.48 15.8 17.7%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 98 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 92.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal Impact

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Publication years Publications Average SNIP Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 39.0 1.29 21.0 53.8%
2015-2017 42.7 1.18 20.3 47.5%
2016-2018 45.7 1.29 22.8 49.9%
2017-2019 47.4 1.30 22.6 47.8%
2018-2020 46.6 1.45 25.2 54.2%
Total 102.0 1.34 53.1 52.0%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 98 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 92.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Field normalized journal impact (SNIP)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
Publication years Publications Corporate co-publications Share corporate International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 97 0 0.0% 33 34.0%
2015-2017 108 0 0.0% 42 38.9%
2016-2018 108 0 0.0% 45 41.7%
2017-2019 108 0 0.0% 47 43.5%
2018-2020 106 1 0.9% 54 50.9%
Total 243 1 0.4% 103 42.4%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 97 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 93.3%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)

International and corporate co‑publication

About

Row